Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 20:09
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Amazon joins the big nuclear party, buying 1.92 GW for AWS - TechCrunch
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
ChatGPT May Be Linked to 'Cognitive Debt,' New Study Finds - 404 Media
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Quantum Vacuum Breakthrough: Oxford Physicists Make Light Emerge From “Nothing” - SciTechDaily
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
GameStop Earnings Reveal Return to Profits. Why the Stock Is Dropping. - Barron's
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
In the Belly of This Beast, a Major Find - Newser
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.